By Andrew Baker
Critique time:
What they got right
- I wanted to cite these two stories together because I think "new media" like Politico and The Huff do a great job of breaking news and following developing stories like this one was on Saturday.
- Politico does a very good job of giving context and background to the story. They add great depth to the issue.
Where they missed the mark
- I mentioned above that Politico does a good job of providing context. Let me qualify my statement: context is only a good thing insofar as it doesn't swallow up the larger story. Towards the end of the piece I began to wonder if I was reading the same story because the focus completely shifts to the president.
- Theres no easy way to say this, so I'll just go ahead and put it out there: The Huffington Post's opinion pieces are so numerous and so biased I had a hard time finding a real news story amongst all the one-sided commentary.
When all is said and done, the internet is a fabulous tool for breaking news quickly. That is if you can wade through all the bloviation and bias.
(photo credit: insidecatholic.com)
I think this is a prime example of Democrats inability to govern. Don't get me wrong, I love Democrats, it just seems the Dems in Congress are so divided they will not be able to accomplish anything.
ReplyDeleteAs as side note about Boxer: I know liberals who base their response to the question boxers or briefs on ideology, "boxers for Boxer, briefs for blue dogs."